I was asked if I was O.K. with boylove or NAMBLA by someone a few weeks ago. My reply was simply “No.” And there are reasons to just throw them under the bus. I support young love in general, but I will never endorse “boylove”. I will provide you an explanation for my motives.
1.- I can not support sex with prepubescents, since I would rather avoid such a thing. I prefer to stay neutral to it, but I can not support it. And since most boylovers focus exclusively on prepubescent males, I won’t support them.
2.- It is a bad PR move. Anyone who supports male sexualism risks being associated with far left movements if there is any positive stance on boylove.
3.- I oppose sexual activities with no eventual intent of reproduction. I firmly believe people should form families once they are ready. Any homosexual act is not reproductive, and from that stance I oppose it. While I just act with indifference to homosexual acts, I won’t speak in favor of literal homosexual pedophiles. It goes against my goals.
4.- They threw us under the bus in the past. They did so to gain brownie points with feminists and LGBT communities. I am not going to side with a faction which offers me no benefit and is willing to throw us under the bus, and in fact it makes more sense to pay them back.
Boylove groups such as NAMBLA, just like the pathetic castrated males of VirPed, who would rather hope for feminist organizations to feed them scraps than act as free men, are a dead weight to male sexualism or any movement that seeks to remove the social stigma imposed by feminism on natural male sexual preferences.