What Epstein did wrong.

Jeffrey Epstein was the Al Capone of lolita. A man who profited from the current age of consent laws in which a fully fertile male and a fully fertile female can not be together if the arbitrary numbers don’t match their age.

Since he basically trafficked young women to please men, he is often seen as a sort of hero to those who want change in this authoritarian society standing against male sexuality. Just like Al Capone was seen as a hero to those who wanted booze in his time.

However,just as Al Capone, Epstein was wrong. Not only he favored, and supported, the same people who kept the prohibition working, since that meant he could make profit, he also took part in human trafficking.

Let us set the age of his targets aside. Human trafficking is wrong, no matter the affected people’s age. She can be 9, 12, 20, or even 55, and it will be wrong, regardless of age. He also allowed the seuxal freedom of many to remain cut in order to keep his business afloat.

He backstabbed his fellow men, and sold women to the rich ones. That is unacceptable. That is not the goal of liberating male sexuality from the filthy grasp of feminism. What he did not only kept the insanely high age of consent as it is, but also prevented men from having what they desire, youthful fertile women.

Jeffrey Epstein was not a hero, he was a traitor to male sexuality, and even worse, someone who made profit out of his treason. As such, men should also frown upon him, not for his sexual preferences or the age of his victims, but because he ensured there was scarcity in a safe environment to keep his business going.

He didn’t help men, he helped feminism.

Reset the counters!

Recently I was talking to someone regarding a man we both know, a male feminist that is, and she mentioned how hard it was to be taken seriously by him because of his evident opinion on women as less capable than men in all senses.

I laughed and told her “You took a while to notice! He’s a male feminist! Of course that was bound to happen!”

To her my statement was almost comical, and just reiterated my stance on feminism, which I have mentioned several times before to anyone I know so far. However to me it was a reminder of the fact that all white, and blue, knights are so only for the sole purpose of covering their own twisted world view.

I was sincerely not surprised at all by her statement. I knew he had a very negative opinion on women, often covered as support of them. He will often speak of how oppressed women are and as such how justified the behavior of feminists is, yet at the same time I know a few rotten acts he has brought upon the women he so champions.

It is yet another example of the usual, a reminder that not a single male feminist is such for a reason other than covering his own insecurities regarding women.

As someone who used to be such, I can tell it is a 100% guaranteed thing.