We must reinstate dowry ASAP.

While dowry is not precisely essential to preserve male sexuality or restore the sex market value of men and women under 18, it is essential to prove a more important thing. That one’s wife is debt free.

We all know men like them debt free, after all marriage is an investment and a negative investment is not acceptable. Marrying at a loss is something neither men nor women want. However since women spend more money than they earn due to their desire to gain attention through material wealth, they are more likely to acquire debt while acquiring other things with money they don’t have.

As such dowry becomes useful to prevent such instances of marriage fraud. If men marry only those who have some sort of dowry or are under 18, they will find a vast number of debt free spouses to start a family with. No more debt slave marriages and no more meth indebted wives. Ge the top 90% of women competing for the 100% of men and let the 10% femihags (Based on dwindling UK feminist numbers) die out. Make men have more sex market value than women by making them the coosers through dowry.

Of course to improve male sexualism we could always make any woman under 20 exempt from dowry, encouraging men to marry their daughters and ending agecuckery by making it too expensive to be an agecuck.

Femoids vs Gynoids.

Do you ever wonder why feminists protest so much about sex robots? Most people will point at the obvious fact that they could replace women entirely. However that is a partial truth, since femihags will often insist women need men as much as fish need bikes. Therefore being replaced would “release them from the burden” of acting in the benefit of men.

What femoids truly fear about sex robots is that men will realize there is no real difference between a femoid, and a gynoid. That both are programed and compliant, provided one uses a particular set of tools. And thus women’s rights will be revoked, and while many females will just live the same pampered life they had with or without rights (Especially younger women), femoids will find themselves at the mercy of the same men they abused, and they will turn them into organic gynoids.

Sex robots will provide men with an understanding of how female NPCs work, and if anatomically accurate would allow them to understand female anatomy and biology without the need of a woman to allow them to observe it. This would also lead to men taking the crimson pill (or loli pill) and deciding that the whole notion of sex with women under the age of 18 (Or 20 if we keep allowing femoids to rule over consent laws) would lead to damage to their bodies.

Gynoids would debunk, by being identical to a woman in most ways, all feminist myths and ideals, and effectively lead to the destruction of feminism and the extinction of the Western femoid.

As any natural development of humanity, sex robots benefit the patriarchy. After all most builders in history have been men, with a few patriarchal women joining the ranks of creators, instead of consumers.

Women are not negatively affected by the patriarchy, femoids are.

The unpleasant truth of feminism: It is men’s fault.

Yes. I know many of you will be shocked at my headline, and probably might want to just drop this blog for good, but you should listen carefully. It is our fault because WE ALLOWED IT TO EXIST.

We didn’t crush the movement as soon as it started to show signs of malignancy, we didn’t pull the damned tumor boiling in Great Britain and turning into a horrible societal illness formed from puritanism and hatred.

Feminism bloomed because men caved in to constant nagging and their instinctual tendency to protect women. We were unable to remain rational and cold and disregard female cries for help at some non existent threat. In the end our desire to seek the best interest for both turned into our downfall, for we forgot when a scornful woman decides to damage society she must be treated as a man would in such cases and brought down.

We allowed feminism to grow, we gave women the vote under circumstances that allowed feminists to enter politics, we gave women special rights which went beyond basic human rights, we allowed them to raise the age of consent beyond the natural norm, and we allowed them to rule in terms of education, medicine, and even war.

Feminists, who are unable to reason or think in terms of logic took over, and removed all intelligent process from our society. There is no choice but to terminate this by leading to a full societal collapse, before they take full control and bring the consequences of other men’s mistakes upon us.

The origins of hysteria.

In my constant idle musings I understood why people fall into the state of pedo hysteria we live in nowadays, and why I did not. They protect their own from themselves.

Most of these people who are more prone to concepts such as “stranger danger” or “pedophile vans” are not precisely good people. They are moral people, that is for certain, but they will gladly enact hideous deeds if morally allowed. As exemplified in the violent manner in which they threaten anyone who defies their status quo.

Many of them claim of doing to “pedophiles” (many of them just guys who like women 12 and up) what they claim pedophiles do to children. They list all the many ways in which they would gladly rape and torture a “pedophile”, often explicitly stating hideous acts such as mutilation and what could only be described as extreme sexual violence.

Their imaginary narratives, which I refuse to repeat due to finding them disgusting, would fit the label of ultraviolence. They seek, deep inside, a excuse to enact all those horrors. And as such when they see their children in proximity to an “adult”, no longer “innocent” or “pure” to their wretched eyes, they feel a sudden pang of fear born from the idea that the man before them could turn out to be like they are. A monster with repressed violent urges.

It is of course something not reserved to men, since women are also capable of, and more prone to, performing acts of vile and cowardly violence. Of course due to their physical and societal limitations women tend to be the intellectual authors of such horrors, with a male accomplice carrying out the acts. As such women tend to react violently to that fear of a man who is as rotten as they are more often than men do.

But who is to blame then? Some children are born just as rotten as the most crooked criminal, and start their life of crime even before hitting puberty. Examples of such children are heard in nearly all educational institutions. One or two students during the school’s history who raped or murdered a classmate, or who was known for acts of animal abuse, only to end up in jail upon reaching “adulthood” (In quotations since we speak of legal terms and not biological terms).

These people leave a negative stain in society, and the rest of the population, who are moral yet not good, recognize them as the part of their own they detest, and adscribe their evil to those who are not like them.

They consider anyone they see as equal a threat to their children, because they are a latent threat to society, only restrained by morality. And no matter how pure and kind any innocent man is, as long as the morally righteous yet mentally ill mob sees them as equal, they will be guilty. As such they foam from their mouths whenever they see a decent man with a woman they see as “too young” because they believe the man will act the way they do and take advantage of her.

It is the most evil people who fuel and preserve pedo hysteria, as well as rape hysteria and any other hysteria. They are a societal disease that makes other people evil and make everyone distrust each other. Meanwhile they benefit from such hysteria, creating an environment where their mental rot can spread.

#MeToo is their creation, so are age of consent laws. They create these rules that apply to everyone, no matter how kind and harmless they could be, to prevent their own evil from going unbound.

These hysterical people are the ones who will do something horrible if they think they can get away with it. They require morality, and as such laws such as the current consent laws, to not commit those crimes they so fear would befall on their peers.

My stance on age based laws.

The tolerance paradox.

A guy I met yesterday brought something to me that I found fascinating. He spoke of the importance of tolerance in society, which I incline to disagree slightly on, but he also mentioned the tolerance paradox itself. That is, will you tolerate intolerance or abuse then? If being tolerant is important, how far will that go?

Well. The thing is, tolerance is a mistake in many cases. Abuse in fact is one of the things that happen if one becomes way too tolerant. People who willingly allow abuse for the sake of being “good people” are unhealthy and harm themselves and others. Generally speaking such people are willing to censor and criminalize harmless things to prevent “offense” to certain groups.

There is also another error resulting from tolerance, which happens due to excessive well behavior. That is allowing those who misbehave to do so. Allowing evil and injustice to happen because one does not want to be intolerant or “abusive.”

This is often seen in how women behave in Western societies. Since the standards are too low, they are willing to engage in harmful behavior such as punching men for no reason, provoking fights, or causing property damage. All because kind hearted, patient, and tolerant men in their environment refuse to act as if it was a man who is doing that.

My solution sounds extreme and could lead to accusations of sexism, but it is functional. If a woman does something that would lead you to punch her were he a male, punch her too. Do not hesitate, do not allow misbehavior, cruelty, or injustice, just because the perpetrator is attractive. Same crime, same punishment.

Men and women are not equal biologically, and often not even socially, but if there is something in which equality should, and on paper does, take place, is when it comes to punishment. Because in terms of an act what matters are both results and intent, and as such if there is ill intent and there is harm, there is a crime, or at least an unacceptable act.

Do not let your girlfriend spit on the face of a random guy she got mad at. Do not let your sister break a window in a fit of anger. Teach them to be adults, responsible ones, the way you teach men to do so.