Women’s rights should be put into question.

Laws have been made in a way that women’s rights are a negative. Why? Because they are full of double standards.

In theory it sounds great to make sure one’s mother and daughters have rights that guarantee their survival. But thanks to feminism, women began to abuse their rights. As such it is time to end the double standards by punishing them for violating the rules.

Recently I caught a woman cheating on her spouse. The same woman chastises male cheaters, she did so just hours ago being caught. Such a woman should have all her rights revoked and be set at the mercy of those she wronged.

Such women should be set straight through physical action to ensure society will function.

9 thoughts on “Women’s rights should be put into question.

  1. galileo1439 says:

    I am certainly in favor of physical punishment (beating) of women who disobey their husbands or harm the family honor. I think laws should be changed so that the family courts enforce and protect a man’s right to beat his women and a man’s right to sexual access to his women as long as they are his wives. I also think men should in some circumstances be imprisoned for failure to correct a disobedient woman, especially under circumstances where her misbehavior is likely to encourage other women to disobey their husbands.

    • galileo1439 says:

      When it comes to parenting girls should be punished 1.5 to 1.75 times what a boy gets for similar misbehavior. Boys should be encouraged to beat up girls ans taught to do so before he reaches the age where he starts to get attracted to girls (no later than seven). School should be completely changed if not abolished. Kids should be employed fully by age six or seven. Modern safety technology makes many types of work as safe as kids have it in grade school today, at least for most modern office and programming etc. Jobs child labor prohibition is obsolete and should be repealed.

    • I agree. A week ago I would have disagreed, but after I caught that bitch redhanded and she played victim, I am through with niceness. Follow the fucking rules or get your rights revoked. That is how such women should be treated. But it is not all her fault. I firmly believe a younger woman who marries an older men before she reaches the age of 20 is less likely to fuck up that way, because she forms a bigger dependence on him.
      Never marry a “strong and independent” woman who has been touched by feminism.

      • Sara Ahmed says:


        Just because something is technically legal, doesn’t mean you should do it. I’m just gonna be blunt here, most 30 year old men who are going for such young girls do NOT have good intentions. I don’t know why you want to date a 16-19 years old, but whichever it is, this is wrong. And it shouldn’t be subjective. It’s just objectively wrong. A 30 year old man is done growing. He is at a COMPLETELY different stage in his life. A 16-19 year old girl is not done growing, physically, mentally or emotionally. There is so much potential for manipulation and abuse in a relationship like this. A 30 year old man going for a 16-19 year old girl is creepy as hell and wrong and I would never trust a man like that. Really, why does a grown ass man need to pursue someone who is, relative to him, basically a child? He’s old enough to be her father. I really don’t enjoy being a cruel or judgmental person, but I am not going to pretend these relationships are ever okay. Even if you think they’re working. You don’t need to be +11 years older than your partner, you really don’t. A 16-19 year old girl to a 30 year old man is a CHILD. This is an adult dating a child. It is messed up. It’s predatory and it’s a horrible idea.

      • Don’t worry about being blunt. It is clear you are not the sharpest knife in the set. You are not just blunt, but also dull.
        Let me break down all your arguments from the weakest to the strongest.
        Once you hit puberty you are no longer a child.
        No one at or above the age of 15 is a child at all.
        People generally speaking stop their innate mental maturation at age 10 and from there mature through experience and not age.
        No man in his 30s could have a child older than 10, since economically it is impossible for him to afford parenting under 20, unless the mother was older than him and affluent, which actually backs my argument in favor of age gaps.
        Being “creepy” is an entirely subjective matter. It is not objective. In fact I find you creepy since you see only the negative aspects.
        Manipulation and abuse happen among people with no age gap, so that argument is entirely moot. In fact I have noticed a lot more manipulation and abuse from immature men than from mature men.
        Predatory behavior is not age based, it is based on individual character. A sex offender is as likely to commit the first offense while under the age of 10 than above the age of 40. Because sexual abuse is not an age matter.

  2. AnonGuy says:

    In case it isn’t completely evident, we’ll spell it out for you:

    Do NOT post about “teens”, “young girls”, “jailbait”, “questionable age”, or anything that could be construed as advocating sex involving minors.

    This rule also applies to WordPress. Don’t take it there, don’t even recommend that people post that shit there. We don’t want it anywhere on this site.

    These are obviously salacious, seductive, sexual advocacy of sex, with 16-year-olds. This is a sexual fetish. This is pedophilia,

    No matter what way you stack it up, that’s the way it is.

    We take down Pedophiles. We are good at it. Expect us!


    • So. You are trying to bully me into censorship because you don’t like my questioning of Califronian laws which don’t even apply to federal US law? Even though I am not even a US resident?
      No sir. It is not pedophilia, you are ridiculous, and justice is not coming because I did nothing.
      I don’t know who this “we” you speak of are, but you are pathetic. Even if this blog, which was already dead when I began the rebranding, died, I will just return stronger and bolder.
      After all, if you think my campaigning is limited to the internet, you are mistaken. All words I preach here, I do so in my community, with a lot more success than here to be sincere.
      Not only that, but your fervent desire to silence us actually brings us to the spotlight.
      I solely write facts as they are, and speak up truths that are heavily censored by the feminist controlled establishment.

    • Robert A. Lindsay says:

      What’s wrong with fucking 16 year old girls? Personally, I think it’s a great idea! 17 year old girls too. I mean I can’t because it’s illegal, but I still think it’s a great idea. Of course it’s not pedophilia, you fucking retard. I work in mental health. A man wanting to have sex with or even having sex with a 16 year old girl is not pedophilia. It is not any type of mental disorder. It’s not even hebephilia, which is not even disordered. It’s not even usually ephebephilia, which is not only not a disorder but it is completely normal!

      Yes, according to modern psychiatry, men desiring to or having sex with 16 year old girls is not mental illness of any kind. In fact, modern society says that such desires and acts are completely normal!

      Now it may very well be illegal, but that is another matter.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s